Error reviews

Operational insight without live dashboards.

The original error dashboard relied on client-only frameworks and background polling. On static hosting we now document issues through curated updates, providing the same context with zero runtime surprises.

Why we removed the live dashboard

Live scripts add fragility

Client-side charts and hot reloading APIs fail on static hosts such as GitHub Pages, so outages were common.

Opaque runtime state

Troubleshooting required digging through console logs and timers instead of reviewing commit history.

Heavy dependency footprint

Multiple framework islands forced extra npm installs, slowing every build despite little day-to-day value.

Static error review workflow

  1. 1 Capture signals Gather lint, test, and monitoring results from your CI provider or local scripts as markdown-ready notes.
  2. 2 Summarise trends Translate raw logs into a short narrative that highlights regressions, mitigations, and owners.
  3. 3 Version the report Commit the update alongside code changes so reviewers can diff new risks before approving merges.
  4. 4 Share with stakeholders Post the rendered page or exported PDF to Slack, email, or status channels for full visibility.

Checks to keep on the radar

Accessibility

  • Keyboard traps cleared
  • Color contrast verified
  • ARIA labels audited

Performance

  • Largest Contentful Paint target met
  • Bundle size delta recorded
  • Image optimisations reviewed

Security

  • Dependency scan exported
  • Headers configuration noted
  • Secrets rotation schedule confirmed